ABSTRACT
SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the awareness and perspectives of acromegaly patients in the diagnosis and treatment processes and to evaluate basic clinical and demographic features. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Endocrinology Department of Yildirim Beyazit University between March 2019 and April 2020. A total of 58 acromegalic patients were enrolled. All patients were identified from our database and called for a clinical visit and filling the questionnaire forms. RESULTS: A total of 58 patients were included in this study (41.4% female). The mean age of the patients was 52±10.8 years. Median year from symptom to diagnosis (min-max) was 2 (1-12). Notably, 55.2% of the patients did not graduate from high school. Of the 58 patients, 30 (51.7%) patients had knowledge about the etiology of their disease. While 12 (20.7%) patients identified their initial symptoms themselves, 75% of the patients reported their symptoms during the clinical history taken by a health care professional. The majority of patients were diagnosed by an endocrinologist (69%). Acromegaly did not affect social life but affected work life and caused early retirement. Transsphenoidal surgery was performed as primary treatment in 96.6% of the patients (n=56). In all, 46 (79.3%) patients received medical treatment with somatostatin receptor ligands (e.g., octreotide or lanreotide long-acting release [LAR]) with or without cabergoline. Overall disease control was achieved in 38 (65.5%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Acromegaly is usually detected incidentally by clinicians. The diagnosis of acromegaly is delayed in most patients and disease-related complications have already developed at the time of diagnosis. Therefore, increasing the awareness of the society and health care professionals will reduce both disease-related comorbidities and the economic burden on the health system.
ABSTRACT
SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: Primary hyperparathyroidism is a common endocrine disease and most cases are asymptomatic. Currently, in a hypercalcemic patient, the first laboratory investigation is serum primary hyperparathyroidism measurement. However, the primary hyperparathyroidism level cannot be measured in many primary healthcare centers in our country. In addition, serum calcium levels are normal in normocalcemic primary hyperparathyroidism patients, even if most centers have serum calcium levels measured. Therefore, a simple and inexpensive laboratory biochemical marker is required for the diagnosis of primary hyperparathyroidism. Recently, the calcium/phosphorus ratio has been proposed as a suitable tool for diagnosing primary hyperparathyroidism. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of serum calcium/phosphorus ratio in primary hyperparathyroidism screening. METHODS: A total of 462 patients followed in our clinic with a diagnosis of primary hyperparathyroidism were reviewed in this retrospective study. Out of these patients, 148 with normal levels of serum parathyroid hormone, calcium, and phosphorus were selected as the control group. Serum calcium, corrected calcium, phosphorus, albumin, parathyroid hormone, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, and creatinine were evaluated. The diagnostic accuracy of the calcium/phosphorus ratio was investigated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: There were 404 (87.4%) females and 58 (12.6%) males in the primary hyperparathyroidism group. Calcium, parathyroid hormone, and calcium/phosphorus ratio were significantly higher in primary hyperparathyroidism than in controls (p<0.001 for each). Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses identified a cutoff value of 2.59 (3.35 if calcium and phosphorus are measured in mg/dL) for the calcium/phosphorus ratio, with a sensitivity of 90.5% and specificity of 93.2% (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The calcium/phosphorus ratio is a simple and inexpensive method for primary hyperparathyroidism screening when a cutoff value of 2.59 is used.